Monday, February 17, 2020
Black and Dull Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words
Black and Dull - Essay Example Rather, Diouna, the black girl, was mistreated, abused. She had no family, relatives or friends to help her in her helpless situation. There was no one to comfort her but herself. Nevertheless, it is said that ââ¬Å"no man is an islandâ⬠and when isolation was the only thing there was to comfort her, Diouna showed that death is sweeter than life. The story is set in the 1960s when racial discrimination was still so strong. Although the number of characters is limited, they exemplified the majority of cases among the Black employees and White employers. Between Madame Pouchet and Diouna there was nothing that would tie them together but the relationship of employer-employee. Pouchet was not obligated to be good to her maid but she went the extra mile of being generous to her while they were still in Africa. However, the future eventually revealed her motives. She was not actually as generous and good as she showed in Africa. She discriminated her maid. Diouana never went out of the house but continually worked for the family and a visitor. There was no freedom, no day of rest but a pile of work to do and a bunch of demanding family members in exchange for a mere three thousand Francs a month. Madame Pouchet knows how difficult Diouanaââ¬â¢s situation is because during their earlier vacations, she often had to do the household chores herself and take care of her own two children. Her former maids were not only paid higher salaries but they also demanded a day off and she often had to fire them. Yet she was not considerate about the Black girlââ¬â¢s needs. She knows that there is nothing Diouna could do once she is with them in another country. She proved to be harsh. Probably, Pouchetââ¬â¢s true colors can be said to have been revealed when they were in France as it is shown with her words to Diouna before she took her life saying, ââ¬Å"But to find you telling lies, like a native, that I donââ¬â¢t likeâ⬠(776). In reaction, the Black girl ââ¬â¢s lips trembled, probably showing extreme anger that led her to just end her life. For the other harassments she experienced in the Pouchet family, Diouana was simply described to have been exasperated but not angry. Yet the discriminatory comments of Madame Pouchet brought her to the peak of her impatience. In addition, the children became a burden not only because of the demand for her to work harder but because of the psychological abuse they have devised against Diouna. The oldest child called friends and led them into taunting her with a chant of ââ¬Å"Black girl, Black girl. Sheââ¬â¢s as black as midnightâ⬠(773). She was, to the very sense of it, a slave. She was mocked but still did everything to their liking and was left with nothing but three thousand Francs. She was not just a cook, nursemaid, and chambermaid for the family but to the friends and extended family of the Pouchets as well as she was taken from villa to villa to serve family and friends. She was, in her own words, ââ¬Å"Bought, bought. Sold, soldâ⬠(775). To make things worse, when they went to the commodoreââ¬â¢s residence, ââ¬Å"some silly people, who followed her about, hanging on her heels in the kitchen, had been there for dinner. Their presence was an oppressive shadow on her slightest movement. She had the feeling of not knowing how to do anythingâ⬠(774). Since she was Black, a girl from an uncivilized nation, the people judged her as ignorant. Maybe she was, but not in manners they
Monday, February 3, 2020
Ownership Rights over Ones Person Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words
Ownership Rights over Ones Person - Essay Example However, quite a few pundits have believed that Locke's argument is only applicable in the state of nature but not in civil society, where property is decided not by one's work or effort but by laws. (Arneil 1996, p. 155) On the other hand, ownership is defined as "a particular type of property interest in which the person designated as owner is deemed, in some sense at least, to have the greatest possible interest in the thing." (Clarke 2005, p. 180) Another definition of ownership categorizes the owner as an individual who has ultimate control. (Waldron 1988, p. 47) But this theory cannot be said to be without any flaw. Although it has been said that ownership carries with it property rights and incidents, it is to be understood that ownership has a social aspect and the interest over it is not unbounded. The right to ownership is not absolute; there are some limitations to the enjoyment of one's right to property and ownership. Basic examples of these limitations include the prohibition of nuisance and injurious usage of a property; legal responsibility to taxation, execution and expropriation; State rules intended to regulate the use of property; and sometimes, imposition of certain obligations. While there are some limitations to the enjoyment of one's property a... In the incident of control, the right to possession, use and management are included. The right to possess is that inherent right to obtain physical control over the thing, while the right to use is characterized by the owner's personal use and enjoyment of the thing owned. Both of these rights include consumption and modification. The right to manage, on the other hand, is that right to choose and determine the manner and the person with which and with whom the thing owned shall be used. The income incidents, in contrast, include the right to income or the fruits, profits and rent produced by the thing owned. Other incidents consist of the right to capital, right to security, power of transmissibility, the absence of term, the prohibition of harmful use, liability to execution and the incident of residuarity. Being incidents of ownership, the foregoing rights are inherent in the concept of ownership of property. Now that the basic definition and concept of property and ownership have already been extensively discussed, let's go back to the earlier question with regard to the classification of body and/or its parts as "property". In his book Second Treatise of Government, John Locke wrote: Though the earth and all inferior creatures be common to all men, yet every man has a "property" in his own "person." This nobody has a right to but himself. The "labour" of his body and the "work" of his hands, we may say, are probably his. (Locke 2004, 17) The essential meaning of this connotation is that, a human being has all the right and ownership over his own "person." But does it mean he can have all the incidents of ownership over his person Can one appropriate and alienate his own person What about his own body The answer
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)